Rioters of London, remember to leave some real estate standing so mortgage companies have a product to deny you.
I wish the poor shopkeepers luck in claiming on their insurance or getting small business loans. The wrong buildings are on fire.
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Civil Liberties, Coalition, Conservatives, Justice, Law, LibDems, Media, Politics, Society
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Chancer's Paradise, Chauncey Gardiner, Civil Liberties, Clusterfuck To The Poor House, Coalition, Conservatives, Justice, Labour, Law, LibDems, Media, Politics, Society, TV
Rioters of London, remember to leave some real estate standing so mortgage companies have a product to deny you.
I wish the poor shopkeepers luck in claiming on their insurance or getting small business loans. The wrong buildings are on fire.
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Chancer's Paradise, Coalition, Conservatives, Law, Loathe Google, Media, Politics, Society, t'Internet
Yesterday Ofcom pleased its political masters by repealing laws passed by Parliament. It may have repealed a dodgy law, but that’s beside the point: it’s not how our system is supposed to work. No matter how dodgy a law may be, it is not a quango’s job to repeal it. It’s the job of legislators. And a powerful regulator should be independent, and not heel to its political masters – although anyone who followed the history of the regulator will permit themselves a hollow cackle at that principle.
Ofcom repealed Sections 17 and 18 of the Digital Economy Act by expressing no more than an opinion: the justification to support that opinion is absent from its report. Ofcom could have set out its case in terms of explaining the legal framework, for example, but it didn’t. It could have argued the costs and benefits of each approach to web-blocking – but it didn’t, it hadn’t even attempted to do that kind of empirical research.
Instead, on page 43, we learn that: “It is our current belief that the blocking of discrete URLs, or web addresses, is not practical or desirable as a primary approach.” What’s practical is not defined, what’s “desirable” is well beyond Ofcom’s remit.
Imagine the uproar if a quango had interposed itself to block significant primary legislation: Britain’s entry into the Common Market for example, or the minimum wage. All are quite complicated issues, after all. The blame isn’t entirely Ofcom’s; the regulator was permitted to do this because ministers wanted to find a way to bury the Sections without Parliament formally repealing them. Again, this is dishonest, and not the way laws are made or unmade. Ed Vaizey has been trying to get industry to agree to self-regulation which would allow him to announce their imminent repeal (most likely in the next Communications Act).
The Conservatives came to power vowing to abolish Ofcom, and declaring war on what they saw as Leftish academic poseurs, and business-hostile bureaucrats. They now seem to be at the mercy of all three. How on Earth did that happen?
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Chancer's Paradise, Labour, Law, Politics, Radio
I’ve just heard The Disgraced Former Europe Minister Keith Vaz on the radio talking about honour, integrity and people correctly resigning to take responsibility for their actions.
Once more, for clarity: that’s THE DISGRACED FORMER EUROPE MINISTER KEITH VAZ opining on honour, integrity, and taking responsibility.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Oh, fuck me.
(With thanks to Pickled Politics for the title.)
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Chancer's Paradise, Justice, Law, Media, Rubbisher
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Coalition, Conservatives, Justice, Labour, Law, LibDems, Politics
So, a year on from the public school wank-a-thon in the Rose Garden, how’s that ConservativeCoalition government working out for y’all?
Still, at the least the clear, decisive alternative is so much better.
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Law, Media, Music, t'Internet
Q: Who lives in a – truly amazing – house like this?
(And no, Gilles Toucas, I haven’t forgotten about you, either, don’t you worry. Cock.)
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Law, Nasty Racists, Politics, Society, t'Internet
The Nasty Racists received 943,598 votes (which means the UK is home to nearly a million cunts). This equated to 6.2% of the UK vote.
Sweden’s Pirate Party – campaigning for free downloads and not much else – received 7.1% of the Swedish vote.
If there is hope, it lies with consoles.
(Come on, I’m trying my best here.)
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Arrivederci Gordon, Labour, Law, Nasty Racists, Politics, Society
I know I feel so much better, happier and self-confident waking up this morning to the sultry voice of Nick Griffin MEP jizzing all over John Humphrys’ face on Today.
Charlie Brooker summed it up neatly in fewer than 140 characters last night:
BNP voters have ruined the 65th anniversary of D-Day by metaphorically pissing on the graves of all who died fighting the Nazis.
Both of the nasty racists elected as MEPs have convictions for offences aggravated by racial factors.
Which is nice.
After 12 years of “progressive” Labour government, society has changed so much for the better that we’re sending convicted racists to represent us in Europe. Change you can believe in…
This will do fuck all but I’d still urge you to add your name because you’ll feel marginally less dirty afterwards.
By BigBrother in All posts No Comments Tags: Chancer's Paradise, Justice, Law, Media, Society
English libel law is fucked up beyond all recognition.
Thanks to its costs and evidential rules (English libel law being one of a tiny number of areas of law in which a defendant must prove his/her innocence rather than the other way around), it is being abused repeatedly by the wealthy, forcing journalists, authors and publishers to work under increasingly restrictive conditions. British democracy isn’t working terribly well these days and a free and unfettered press is vital to robust ideological debate and a healthy democracy.
Recently, the remit of the libel courts has extended to the scientific community. Simon Singh, the science writer, is being sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association over an article he wrote last year for The Guardian. Alan Rusbridger has removed the article in question from his newspaper’s website, though a copy can be read here.
I’m going to err on the side of caution where the Contempt of Court Act 1981 is concerned but if you can spot the libel in that article, you’re a better man than me.
I believe it not only desirable but fundamental for the health and development of society that matters of public interest can be discussed openly and criticised constructively without fear of being dragged through the libel courts. Scientists must be free to evaluate hypotheses and knock them back if they fail scientific scrutiny.
A plethora of issues surrounding English libel law urgently needs addressing by our politicians – HA! – but in the meantime, if you feel strongly about freedom of thought and freedom of speech, you may wish to consider putting your name to a petition being organised by the charitable trusts Sense About Science stating that it is inappropriate to use the English libel laws to silence critical discussion of medical practice and scientific evidence.
Click the button below if you wish to add your support.