Whatever you once had, you’re about to let go

The French presidential campaign is over. A complete media lockdown has been imposed and no further publication or broadcast of campaign material, propaganda or poll information (as well as any public pronouncement by either candidate or any member of their respective parties) is allowed until the vote closes at 8pm on Sunday evening. The most ferocious example of curtailing free speech for the benefit of Democracy.


This gives the French time to think…and I can’t help feeling that as they consider what they’ve been through, and the last 2 weeks in particular, they won’t be feeling too comfortable with their situation.

Sarkozy is an impressive, commanding, driven leader. But he is pure politics. There is nothing in what he says to the French people that isn’t sugar-coated, embellished, devious or basically dishonest. He knows how to win and he will win. He will garner as many votes for his style as his substance, on the basis that, like Blair, people feel that style is half of what you need anyway.

A vast amount of people see through Sarkozy and don’t like what they see. So they turn to the other candidate, whose only apparent weakness before the campaign started was that people weren’t going to take her seriously…that she wasn’t a big hitter. The French people believe in their own social model, which Royal wants broadly to preserve, and they fear Sarkozy’s radical US-republican style revolution and they are right to fear it because it doesn’t fit. So all Royal had to do was to prove herself to be in command of the facts, the policies, her own strategy. Sadly I feel she has failed. In the televised debate shown on Wednesday night, she took Sarkozy on at his own game, she played politics, she enthralled the pundits with her hard-hitting style (check out from 3.21), her turn of phrase, her suit, her haircut, her presentation. She laid into Sarkozy, she played the game. But people didn’t want that, they wanted to hear that she was in command of her facts policies and strategy and sadly, she wasn’t.

No one knows what’s best for France. But plenty of people feel they know what isn’t and that’s Sarkozy’s Thatcherite revolution. So they’re left with a least worst option and many could abstain. The socialists have a good woman as a candidate, but sadly for her and for France, she will still go down as having been a weak candidate. I fear the consequences.

You’ll find there’s nothing new that we can’t leave behind

I was going to write a piece inspired by the rage I feel after Leeds United Football Club went into administration earlier today.

It was going to begin, like all articles about Leeds, by talking about where they were just a few short years ago. I might have remarked that they were so popular that many people were prepared to regard them as their second team, despite Lee Bowyer and David O’Gardenleave. I might have pointed out that, by re-uniting Ken Bates and Dennis Wise – surely the most savvy and likeable coupling since Flashman and Fry at Barnet – many Leeds fans no longer regard the club as their first or second team.

My thoughts would then turn to the wider ramifications of an industry which regarded administration as a business tool. The analysis would touch on the ever-decreasing pool of people prepared to lend money to football clubs and, given that most clubs would be considered sub-prime, the ever-increasing conditions placed on the conduct of the club.

I intended to observe that the future lay not in investment (because even economists admit that there are only so many times that you can find a greater fool), but either in reverse buyouts in which the club is asset-stripped and saddled with debt, or in fans buying clubs and putting assets beyond the reach of the locusts.

I would have spent very little time admitting that many people probably reached this conclusion a long time ago, but would have concluded that those in control of Leeds had once again pissed all over most of the other clubs in the Football League. Leeds can now start afresh in League One, with the Football League’s insistence that “all ‘football debts’ must be settled in full” to comply with its insolvency policy ringing in their tin ears. Do you think “settled” means the same thing as “paid”?

But then I decided not to waste my first free evening in ages on Ken Fucking Bates.

Correction and clarification

In yesterday’s Guardian, Peter Jenkins described Margaret Thatcher as “always a compromiser“. I think he was being serious. As such, I should like to retract any comment I may have made previously that may have implied that Mr. Jenkins could sometimes be a sane and rational political commentator.

As for Mr. Tony Blair’s tenth anniversary in office, let’s just say it’s probably a good job I’m on holiday without proper internet access…